How hard can it be to find one good thing?
I’ve been working through a great summer read written by the highly unassuming author of the semi-famous Bangor Maine Police Department’s Facebook Page - Timothy Cotton. I say I’m working through only because my own time constraints have prevented me from breezing through said book. Cotton’s writing style and use of short story format makes this one easy to devour on a rainy day and we haven’t seen many of those this summer.
Any alliterative allegations against his allegiance to his allies can be put out to pasture by perusing the poignant passages where Cotton winds wisdom with weather to deftly depict life as a Mainer.
Homage to the author aside, part of the book is his own admission that his career has been largely successful not because of (and perhaps in spite of) his talent for concentrating on evidential detail but rather his ability to converse about the more mundane details of life with the most unlikely characters. Cotton attributes his ability to rouse a confession from said “ne'er do wells” to the fact that he can find something good about each person he encounters. In many cases he latched onto that one good component and used it to launch a conversation rather than an interrogation.
Anyone who’s ever been in any kind of trouble should know it’s much easier to confess wrongdoing to someone you trust than an authoritative figure who’s already decided your actions define the kind of person you are. Finding the good in someone, despite specific actions, is key to building rapport. That’s what I’m talking about here.
This weekend Brian and I taught a CCW class to a great group of people (yes they paid for the class but they didn’t pay me to say that, they really were great to work with). As we discussed reading body language, use of the interview stance, and handling people who violate our personal bubbles, one student was called out by her (loving and supportive) husband as being the type of person who sees the good in everyone. His concern for her is that she won’t see danger coming quickly enough because she’s already assumed the person approaching her is there for something good - or at least not something bad.
I don’t think there is anything wrong with being the kind of person who sees the good in everyone. Her outlook on life reminded me of Sgt Cotton’s confession. Here was another person who lives her life finding the good in people. Maybe she isn't doing it as consciously, and maybe she needs to add a touch of skepticism for balance, and maybe we could all use a little balancing.
So this morning as I skimmed through the general nonsense on Facebook (looking for something good) I stopped to read a post by another author I enjoy following. Sean Dietrich offers a perspective on similarly mundane topics with similarly enlightening stories. I won’t repost the whole thing but you can link to it here for reference. In general, his tale this morning involved a cold beer with a stranger while waiting for some takeout food. This stranger asked Sean if he could back up his written claim that he loves everyone. Every person who has done, thought, committed horrible things. Everyone through history who has decimated an entire population for some inadequate reason. Everyone who has ever personally wronged the author at hand. Could Sean seriously and honestly say that he loved those people?
Having endured the stranger’s antagonistic prodding with humility and resolve, Sean replied finally that yes. Yes he could honestly say that at the end of the day he could love those people.
I think his answer hits home with any parent or grandparent or sister who has ever continued to love a child or grandchild or brother in spite of their horrible actions. I don’t mean that time your toddler drew the pretty house with a tree and a smiling sun on the wall behind the laundry room door and you didn’t find it for a good 3 years because who ever closes that door while inside the laundry room? I mean the time your grandson broke into your house and stole your grandmother’s heirloom jewelry so he could sell it for drug money to support his habit. I’m talking about the brother of a woman convicted for killing her own children because she couldn’t see another way out of an abusive relationship with their father.
At the end of the day, someone still loves them.
I’ve heard a lot of good preachers talk about loving the sinner and hating the sin. That’s what Sean’s talking about. I think that’s the key Cotton has managed to use to turn countless encounters with not-so-law-abiding citizens from confrontation to conversation. I think that’s what drives that student in our class to first see everyone as a good person - maybe even the ones who have done bad things.
Do your actions define you? I probably don’t know you but statistically speaking I’m rather confident in saying there are things you have done that you aren’t proud of. Maybe things you’ve never brought to light, but then again maybe you have. Either way, I bet someone knows about them, someone besides you. So you did some things that could be categorized as bad things. Maybe really bad things. Do they make you a bad person? At what point do actions override the good - and the person becomes bad?
In the world where we live today social media has given all people a stage. Anyone can join in, postulate, pontificate, proliferate, and opine. A person can choose to reply to the statements of others with favor, sadness, hilarity, or anger. A group of ten can influence the masses with well turned phrases of partial truths and outright lies. Who can judge? Who among you knows the truth, the whole truth, and will relay nothing but the truth when you choose what to share?
In this world of digitized reality our information has never come at us so quickly - or so inaccurately. When breaking news hits you can hear the same story end six different ways depending which network you follow and at what point you join in the witch hunt.
Loving someone in spite of their actions is the epitome of following Christ. It doesn’t mean you condone the wrong doing. It doesn’t mean you encourage, enable, or enforce the aberrant behavior. Loving the person and hating the sin are not mutually exclusive processes. In fact with a little thought you might realize they have to coexist for either of them to be true at all.
Media - social or otherwise - would have you believe that the people they report on are either good or bad. Black and white are no longer boxes you check on the SAT form, they are now the only options when it comes to sorting through the people with whom we inhabit this planet. Black/White. Good/Bad. Right/Wrong. The society we find ourselves slugging thought nearly demands that you take a side and embrace or condemn people. Failure to do so is unacceptable, but so is disagreement with the establishment. Or agreeing with it. Who even knows?
In the few short years I’ve been riding this rock around the sun I’d like to think I’ve gotten a little wiser than I was when I started. It seems to me that when I look at PEOPLE especially from a distance or through a screen it’s easy to make a judgement call and apply a label. Murderers. Rapists. Religious zealots. Politicians. Rednecks. Rich stiffs. White trash.
When I look at a PERSON up close and without the blur of a camera lens or monitor glow it’s actually easier to see their flaws. That’s a side effect of closing the distance and peering at a thing without distractions.
Like glancing out the window at a wide open field and imagining that’s what Heaven must be like - cool breezes, green grass, blue skies - only to find the cool breeze can only be present with impending rain or the shift to a colder season, the grass has to be tangled with weeds to shine that brightly green, and the blue skies are only so blue when held against the sharp contrast of the thickest clouds.
It’s also easier to see that amidst those flaws there is a person. A person with dreams. A person with tears. A person that someone loves. A person much like the person sitting on this side of the safety offered by a computer screen. Yup - that kind of person.
I don’t think it’s actually that hard to find one good thing. In fact I think it takes no time at all to find many good things when we take the time to pick the PERSON apart from the PEOPLE. If it takes weeds to make my grass green, so be it. If it takes clouds to make my sky shine blue, let’s have it. If it takes a closer view to help me see the PERSON apart from the PEOPLE then God, help me get there.
I also think I did a poor job letting our student know that her ability to see that good so readily… well it made me pause. I will admit I felt just a little bit of envy at that. The world will do its level best to keep us from seeing the person.
It’s up to us - as persons ourselves - to find the good.
PS - You really should check out The Detective in the Dooryard. If you don't know what a dooryard is you should make friends with a native of the great state of Maine.
Our class gathered around
Vicki Farnam of DTI for Women,
no doubt soaking in some
great words of wisdom
from our experienced instructor
I was recently invited to attend a class that was designed just for ladies. When I say I was invited, I mean my friend Caryl posted it enough times that it hit my newsfeed at least once a day until I finally relented and read the invitation.
It was to be hosted by Olde English Outfitters, an long-standing family owned business in our area with a reputation for outfitting the whole family – women included. The instructor is someone I’ve had on my “train with her” bucket list for a while – Vicki Farnam of DTI for Women. She has 30+ years of experience training civilians, law enforcement, and military members, but her focus has been on the differences between men and women. It’s widely accepted that men and women learn differently and may need the information presented in varied formats accordingly. What’s not quite so clear is what about the brain creates those differences and what physiological differences may keep that same material from working for both, even when presented as needed!
So when I (finally) read the invitation I was psyched. The class was being held on a weekend that I actually had OPEN! The cost was a terrific discount from the usual cost of a Farnam/DTI class, and the class size was limited to 20 people each day. Terrific!
Then I read the details. The Saturday class was designed to help women who just got their CCW decide how best to carry their gun in a way that makes them comfortable with the concept. Well, ok, I don’t have to do both days… I’ll see what’s on Sunday.
Sunday – learning how and when to use your firearm in a defensive scenario. Ok, a little more advanced. I can surely learn something from that. But there’s a discount if I take both classes (women are suckers for discounts… men are too, they just won’t admit it). I wanted to get the discount, I wanted as much time to soak up Vicki’s knowledge as I could get, and I didn’t have anything else scheduled for Saturday – so I signed up for a beginner’s gun class.
When I finally decided to sign up it was just 2 weeks before the class. I was a little concerned there wouldn’t be any slots left. It’s a limited seat class and it’s VICKI FARNAM! I reached out to Caryl who was helping coordinate the class. She said even that late in the game, I was only the second person to sign up. I was shocked and a little saddened by the lack of interest. After all… this was Vicki Farnam!
Of course, I got online and talked my friend Angela into joining me. She’s not a beginner either so predictably she balked… but I’m pretty convincing (I also know how to plan a good guilt trip – completely unrelated topic). I told her we could both be beginners for a change, it might be fun. And… it’s Vicki Farnam!
Saturday morning rolled around, a bright, sunny, gorgeous day - just kidding… it’s November in Ohio. I dressed in layers for an invigorating outdoor shooting experience and headed to the range. There were 7 ladies in the first class, a far cry from the 20 spaces they had opened up, but as we would later discuss there seems to be a general lack of urgency in the training industry this year and people just don’t want to commit to something they don’t see as urgent or a necessity. Seven ladies, as it turns out, was the makings of a great class.
As in most classes, Vicki spent some time that morning talking about herself - her training background, her passion and her plans for the day. She then asked us to tell her something about ourselves. About halfway through the session, following the introductions of a few newer shooters, I gave a brief and slightly watered down introduction of myself. I told her I’d been carrying for a few years and have my gun with me as often as I legally can.
Her only follow up question: “Why are you here??”
Well, it’s a long story involving a discount and a free weekend and… she’s Vicki Farnam!! I expressed my general admiration for her work and my belief that even experienced shooters can garner knowledge from a more experienced shooter when it comes to the fundamentals and foundation of defensive shooting. She agreed, and I began learning.
Throughout the course of the weekend, Vicki did an impressive job of reading her students, assessing our skills and needs, and working with each woman individually to address some bad habits and form new good ones. I started out excited to work with such a legend and ended up disappointed only by the fact that class was over after 2 days. I could spend a year watching her teach, coach, and guide new shooters, taking in her passion and absorbing her techniques, and I would still have more to learn.
Yes, it was a class designed to help beginners. That may have stopped some women I know from signing up for the class because many of them consider themselves too advanced for an intro level class. I don’t share that opinion.
There are a lot of beginners’ classes available in your area, I’m sure. Some are terrific and others will be enlightening to you in other ways. I don’t mean to say you should always stay in the first level classes, I’m simply reminding any shooter that there is always something else to learn. I’ve shot for years, but Vicki changed my stance – the very core of shooting posture – and my shots were more consistent and more comfortable than ever. She explained that men and women are built differently (duh) and while the stance I used (and taught!!!) was suitable for the guys, it simply isn’t ideal for women. I’m living proof – learn different techniques and then do what works for you!
Fellow shooters: Seek out dynamic instructors to train with. Absorb differing viewpoints and adopt the parts that work for you. Don’t ever consider yourself too advanced to take advantage of a good opportunity. You might be surprised what you learn when you don’t think you’re learning.
In addition to correcting my stance Vicki taught me a lot of things she probably didn’t intend to. That’s what happens when I put on my student hat and attend a class and THAT, my friends, is the answer the Vicki’s frank question to me on that Saturday morning – Why are you here?
With every new instructor, I learn how to be a better teacher. Sometimes I learn how to handle tough situations (one lady made a potentially dangerous mistake on the range – Vicki handled it with such calm and grace I don’t think anyone else on the line even noticed something was amiss). In a few classes, I’ve learned what doesn’t work when dealing with students (none of that happened in this particular class). In every class I attend, I glean something important about either myself or my students. That information makes me a better teacher, and if I’m honest I think I would have to admit that is more important to me than being a perfect markswoman.
That’s not to say I’m content with my current ability level. I’ll always be a student as well as my own worst critic. I’ll continue to sign up for classes that are beneath my skill level and probably a few that take me well beyond my comfort zone. I would encourage you, wherever you are in your learning, to do the same as often as possible.
Never stop learning.
Practice what you learn.
And for 2018, mark something off your training bucket list. Need some suggestions? Reach out to me, I’m always happy to share my wish list! Maybe I’ll see you there!!
See you on the range
Original artwork by Vicki F
I shoulda gotten that one
We often get good questions from our students, I thought I would share one that is particularly relevant this time of year. Maybe you've encountered similar reactions from your family members, how have you handled them? What other advice would you offer Linda?
While my husband and I carry our handguns nearly every day in our regular activities, the rest of our extended family isn’t quite as on-board with our way of thinking. They know we have, train with, and carry our guns, and they rarely say anything directly regarding this practice, but we can’t help but catch disapproving looks and comments especially regarding carrying around our kids.
This holiday season, we’ll be on the road travelling to family gatherings at the homes of some of these relatives. I don’t want us to be vulnerable on the road, but I also know they won’t approve of us having guns in their homes. What’s the best way to handle this without an argument??
Aren’t the holidays the best?? The food, the sights, the smells, the memories, the… family… ?!?
I’m sure it comes as no surprise to hear you aren’t the only ones facing opposing views from the in-laws when it comes to the issue of defensive firearms. In fact, guns and politics are sure fire (pun happily intended) go-to topics if you want to heat things up on a chilly Christmas Eve!
As is always the case, you have a few options. If your family is only dropping hints about their dislike for firearms, it’s possible you can carry your guns the way you always do in their presence and they will never be the wiser. Discretion is best – there is no need to start an argument for the sake of stirring the pot!
If your family is adamant about not having guns in their home and have singled you out as a potential source of such consternation, you’ll obviously want to avoid hard feelings and furthering their negative view of what should be a benign topic. Again, you have a couple of options. You can always politely decline the invitation to their home. If you take this route, be honest about your decision. Rather than telling them Timmy has the flu (never use your kids in a lie, they will find a way to sink you every time), explain that you are respecting their wishes by not attending the family event where something you believe to be a fundamental way of life is considered taboo.
Not comfortable with that conversation? You always have the option of leaving your guns at home or in your vehicle (safely and securely locked away, of course!). If this is the route you choose, I would recommend you still take along any of the many less than lethal defensive tools I know you also carry daily. Again, there is no need to make those tools an issue any more than you would prominently display your carry gun.
Whatever you decide, make sure you and your husband are on the same page. It’s bad enough feeling vilified by others who don’t understand your lifestyle. It’s even worse if you let it come between you and the ones you love the most. Talk the issue through without emotional attachment to any particular outcome and I’m confident you’ll find a compromise that gives you physical security without causing irreparable damage to important relationships.
We often tell new concealed carriers, “When you stop acting like you have a gun, people will stop noticing you have a gun”. I would say the same is true for avoiding an argument with dissenting viewpoints. “If you act like carrying defensive tools is not a big deal, people will stop making it a big deal”. It’s a way of life, and like any other nonconformist viewpoint the more people are around you and realize it’s not really a thing, the less of a thing it will really be!
Thanks for reaching out, best of luck, and enjoy the holidays!!
…FIREARMS! Ok, so not everyone has a firearm, but just ask around the interwebz and you’ll realize quickly that when it comes to guns, training, tactics, etc… EVERYONE has an opinion!
With so many voices streaming into our consciousness these days, it’s enough to make a new shooter decide to call it quits before you even start. There is simply NO WAY you’re ever going to conform to all the DOs and DON’Ts, the NEVERs and ALWAYSs, the RIGHTs and the WRONGs.
I get it. I’ve been there myself. More to the point, I’ve seen it happen with students. When all of the “experts” in the world have conflicting opinions about everything from holsters to hygiene, it seems unlikely any new shooter will ever get things right enough to be perfect.
Ah – and there is where we can all take a deep breath. PERFECT.
I believe my epiphany about perfection came while sitting in a seminar presented by one of those opinionated experts – Massad Ayoob. (While he may reject the label of “perfect”, Massad ranks high on my list of “people I listen to”). His helpful tidbit, however, was more than an opinion (and I suppose technically less than fact). Although it had a huge impact on the way I train, teach, and frankly LIVE daily, it’s hardly an industry secret. In fact, I’ll share it with you, in all its profound simplicity:
PERFECT is the enemy of GOOD.
Let that one sink it for a moment.
The improbability that we’ll ever be perfect is enough to give anyone pause to even begin an intimidating journey. We all know any journey starts with the first step, but if you’re pretty sure that first step will lead to failure (because that’s the only alternative to perfect), there is a high likelihood you’ll plant your feet firmly in the soil of inaction.
So I’m here to tell you, before you get any farther on your journey – there’s another alternative to perfect!
The other choice - is GOOD!!
Even if your ultimate goal is PERFECT (and I get that, I really do!), GOOD is a necessary step along the way. GOOD is something we should all strive for. Even when we qualify it with ENOUGH, GOOD ENOUGH is always… well… ENOUGH!
Ok, ok, so ENOUGH of the philosophy… how does this address the opinions? –you ask. Well I’m glad you asked.
When it comes to learning anything about firearms I’ve seen too many potential GOOD shooters quit before they even start because of the overwhelming amount of convoluted, conflicting (and often blatantly incorrect) information available telling them how to be perfect shooters. I CRINGE when I hear a fellow instructor tell a new shooter why they should NEVER do something or they HAVE to like this gun or that holster. I can see the light in the new student’s eyes fading quickly as they realize they’ll never have what it takes to be the PERFECT shooter this “expert” is describing.
And it makes me very, very sad.
I want to lay some truth out here for you, and I hope you’ll take it for what it is. At the end of the day, this is my opinion. It may apply to your world, and it may not. If it does, I hope you’ll take hold and run with it. May it help you stay afoot when you start to drown in an unforgiving industry of perfection.
The truth: There are a lot of GOOD options. Guns, holsters, tactics, flashlights, trainers, blogs, magazines, knives – yup, they all come with a lot of GOOD options. They also come with some less than ideal options. There are very few options I would call worthless, and even fewer I would say are perfect.
More truth: What is perfect for me might just be good enough for you. Or frankly, it might not be good enough at all. Dear perfect “experts”: if you see me about to hurt myself, please speak up. Otherwise, please share with me the wisdom of your experience and let the rest be just what it is – your opinion.
The ultimate truth: Perfect is the enemy of good. The fear of never achieving perfection is going to keep good students from taking the first step. Myself included. We should all always be students.
Dear new shooter – keep trying. You aren’t good yet, and I’m ok with that. You don’t have equipment that works for you yet and I’m ok with that, too. Let yourself off the hook for the things that aren’t good. The truth is - they just aren’t good YET.
Take the first step. If you’re already there, pick that foot up and take the next one. It’s your life, make sure you live it.
And what to do with all those opinions? How do you process them all? Compare them all? Sort out the good from the less-than-ideal when there are OH SO MANY???
Why, the same way you eat an elephant.
Take them one bite at a time, chew slowly, and only swallow the parts that help you get GOOD.
If ever you have an opportunity to hear Lt Col Dave Grossman explain the relationship between sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs, please jump at the opportunity. He does it with such passion and conviction you will never look at yourself, the armed citizen, quite the same.
Ever have one of those moments when you let your mind wander just a little farther than usual and it comes back with a realization so clear and obvious you feel a little silly for not having seen it sooner? I had one of those moments today. It had to do with the sheepdog paradigm I’ve heard repeated many times in the last few years. This realization felt important enough to share, so here I am. I’ll see if I can do it justice.
First off, if you aren’t already familiar with this metaphor I’ll briefly explain.
The story goes something like this.
In this world there are 3 basic personality types.
There are SHEEP.
Most of the people you know are sheep. You might be one yourself in fact, and the truth is there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being a sheep. The sheep are incapable of violence. Sheep do not live in fear, they rarely contemplate what dangers are lurking just along the perimeter of their world, they have their routines and their priorities and for the most part things are pretty wonderful in the life of a sheep.
But there are WOLVES.
A very small percentage of our population falls into this category. Wolves are not only capable of violence, they live by it. They are driven daily by one primal directive – prey on the passive sheep. They take advantage of the sheep’s docile nature, waiting at the perimeter of the sheep’s world waiting for the right time to “put on the sheep’s clothing” and strike fear into the heart of the defenseless sheep.
Fortunately, there are SHEEPDOGS.
But the sheep fear the sheepdogs. Sheepdogs are also capable of violence. They lurk warily at the perimeter looking into the darkness as if there were some evil that can’t be seen instead of basking in the joy of the sheep’s peaceful world. Sheepdogs can be loud, fast, and have sharp teeth – just like the wolves!!
For most the metaphor stops there. Good guys, bad guys, and the thin, sometimes-dangerous line of defenders standing between them.
This morning I realized… there is more to the story. In all the times I’ve heard this story, a key player was left unmentioned. More important than the differences that divide sheep and the sheepdog is the one common thread that binds us eternally:
We BOTH belong to the Shepherd.
What drives the sheep to graze in the pasture and bask in the sun is love. Love for the Shepherd who tends and cares for them. Love for a life of peace.
What drives the sheepdog? A love so convicting it will push the sheepdog to that dark perimeter – not without fear, but without hesitation. A love that will cause the sheepdog to run to the wolf, rather than away, praying he can get there in time to protect the sheep.
The sheep that he loves.
Because they belong to the Shepherd.
What binds the sheep to the Shepherd is a mindset of servitude.
What binds the sheepdog to the Shepherd is a desire to serve in ways that go beyond that which is safe. Beyond that which is normal.
At least, in the eyes of the sheep.
Not because of what the sheep think of the sheepdog.
Not because of what they can do for him.
ONLY because they are loved by the Shepherd.
As is the case in many childhood parables it struck me that what makes us different is far less valuable than this critical way in which we are the same.
So that’s it. My epiphany for the day. I would encourage you to check out the foundation for the story in his own words on Grossman’s website: http://www.killology.com/sheep_dog.htm and then follow up by reading A Time to Kill: The myth of Christian pacifism by Greg Hopkins.
~It’s not about the odds. It’s about the stakes.~
Guys, stop laughing. This applies to you too!
You know the old saying. "If I had a dime for every time...." So if I had a dime for every time I hear or read an instructor say his students HAVE to do this or MUST have that or ALWAYS need something else, well I'd have a lot of dimes, but not a lot of confidence as a shooter.
There are very few absolutes in any aspect of life and the shooting sports are no exception, so why are there so many prevailing thoughts that FEEL like absolutes? Because everyone has an opinion, and you know how that saying goes, too.
So the instructor in me says you need to carry the SAME gun in the SAME place with the SAME holster EVERY DAY. Otherwise you will NOT be ready to defend yourself!!
The realist in me knows absolute statements like that do less to serve students with good information and more to intimidate them OUT of carrying their firearm. Telling someone "you're doing it wrong" if they don't conform to our mandates is a sure fire way to convince them they aren't cut out for this, so they'll give up before they begin and not even try. Guess what, fellow instructors, I know your hearts are in the right place, but YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG!
There are people in the world for whom it's very simple to change their entire wardrobe around a gun, select the perfect firearm for all occasions, and settle on one carry method that works every day. Then there are women!
For us there are circumstances that just don't make it that simple. There are kids, business dress codes, widely changing temps between (and sometimes within) the seasons. While these are issues men have to consider as well, I find it's the women in the field who struggle the most when it comes to finding a method of carry that works consistently. Our style of dress varies more broadly, we don't always follow a predictable routine when outside the home, we are expected to hold ourselves physically to a different (more feminine) standard than our male counterparts. Does that mean we shouldn't carry a gun?
Silly question, of course it doesn't. And many of you have heard me say in class that you will have to make certain concessions and compromises when it comes to your outfit/activity/comfort at times in order to be able to successfully carry a gun. I'm not telling you now that comment is incorrect. There is a happy place in between.
I'm not here to tell you where that happy place is. I'm not here to tell you what to change, where to bend and what your priorities should be. Instead I'll share with you what my happy place looks like.
I would LOVE to carry the same gun the same way with the same holster every day. I understand the hazards of changing these things. When I need my gun I will NEED my gun, immediately, without thinking, and without fail! An attack is anything but predictable, so I'll need my response to be as predictable as possible. I need all the tools in my toolbox to be exactly where they were when I trained to use them. I'll be entirely too busy trying to keep up with the bad guy to have to think about where I left them!
For the most part (over half the locations I venture out to daily) I do in fact carry my gun the same way. I carry a Colt Defender on my strong side in an IWB (inside the waist band) leather holster. Nearly anything in my wardrobe will conceal it adequately enough to avoid detection in most circumstances. At least enough so that I don't worry someone will call me out for having a gun.
There are a few places/activities/outfits, however, for which this method just doesn't work. I may know I'll be in close contact with people and the considerable protrusion on my right hip may be more easily detected, or maybe the waistband of my shirt will ride up just enough to expose too much of my gear, or I'll be in the company of those I know to be uncomfortable with the presence of firearms and know they will be scrutinizing my profile for printing. (Yes, this matters to me, I don't like to make people uncomfortable! It may not be a problem for you).
In those situations I've had to resort to what I consider my backup method of carry. In fact it sometimes is a true backup, providing me access to a second firearm, just in case! For those times when concealment is more crucial than all the factors that lead me to the Colt (stopping power, capacity, weight, reliability), I compromise with a smaller caliber, smaller framed firearm. I also move the location from my strong side hip to a cross-draw under-arm position using a belly band situated around the lower half of my ribcage. The thinner profile of the Bersa .380 allows for nearly flawless concealment even in tighter clothing. The position under my arm gives me extra camouflage and terrific ability to "guard" the gun with my arm.
This method also helps when around people who are "huggers".
I... am not a hugger...
That doesn't keep people from hugging me, which always creates a moment of adjustment, making sure their embrace isn't going to bring them in contact with my gun. Having it wedged higher under that arm makes that move just a little easier and seem a little more natural.
Using multiple carry methods is easy from an options standpoint. Women said we wanted more feminine options and the industry responded with everything from fire power modifications to conceal carry purses and corsets. Where it becomes a challenge is that predictability front. If I'm relying on my training, muscle memory and a predictable toolbox to save my life, I've just created a serious roadblock for myself. I have to figure out not only where the gun is today but also which gun is it?!? They don't all function the same, there will be a difference in operation of the firearm, how it feels and how I react with it in my hand. I can't fix that and still have the versatility we all want!!
So I do the only thing I can do when faced with reality:
I acknowledge the situation - I'm putting myself at a tactical disadvantage.
I weigh the options - I can change my whole world, or I can change my training to match my world.
I compensate for the disadvantage - I put in some extra time training with BOTH firearms and BOTH methods of carry. This includes a few minutes spent every morning practicing how to draw and function the gun I'm carrying that day from the holster it will be in and wearing the outfit with which I've chosen to conceal it (ALWAYS with an UNLOADED firearm - see there ARE some absolutes in shooting!!).
I'm sure you can see how more options will lead to more complicated training. The disadvantage increases exponentially with every additional method you add to the routine, at some point making your convenience and lifestyle wishes an unacceptable risk. You alone can figure out where that line of diminished returns falls for you. For me it stops with two options, any more than that and I'm setting myself up to fail. You need to understand the reality, overestimate your personal limitations, prioritize, and train accordingly.
I sure wish I could offer an absolute to make this a simple matter the way some writers would do, but I just can't in good conscience discourage you from carrying if you can't live up to the expectation of a tactical mandate. Beyond a few true, simple rules of safety there just aren't that many absolutes you should trust! Take your time, know yourself, and be smart about it. With this many options on the market, finding a couple that work for you should be easy to check off your list!